UN SECOLO DI INTERVENTI MILITARI DEGLI USA

 

E NOTE SULLA STORIA RECENTE DELL’AFGHANISTAN DAL SITO DELL’ANSWER

 

  • 1890s:
    SOUTH DAKOTA,
    ARGENTINA
    CHILE
    HAITI
    IDAHO
    HAWAII
    CHICAGO
    NICARAGUA
    CHINA
    KOREA
    PANAMA
    CHINA
    PHILIPPINES
    CUBA
    PUERTO RICO
    GUAM
    MINNESOTA
    SAMOA
  • 1900-1910:
    OKLAHOMA
    PANAMA
    HONDURAS
    DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
    KOREA
    CUBA
    NICARAGUA
  • 1910-1920:
    HONDURAS
    CUBA
    PANAMA
    NICARAGUA
    MEXICO
    DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
    COLORADO
    HAITI
    WORLD WAR I
    RUSSIA
    YUGOSLAVIA
  • 1920s:
    GUATEMALA
    WEST VIRGINIA
    TURKEY
    CHINA
    HONDURAS
    PANAMA
    CHINA
  • 1930s:
    EL SALVADOR
    WASHINGTON DC
  • 1940s:
    WORLD WAR II
    DETROIT
    IRAN
    YUGOSLAVIA
    URUGUAY
    GREECE
    CHINA
    GERMANY
    PHILIPPINES
  • 1950s:
    PUERTO RICO
    KOREA
    IRAN
    VIETNAM
    GUATEMALA
    EGYPT
    LEBANON
    IRAQ
    CHINA
    PANAMA
  • 1960s:
    VIETNAM
    CUBA
    GERMANY
    LAOS
    PANAMA
    INDONESIA
    DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
    GUATEMALA
    DETROIT
    UNITED STATES
    CAMBODIA
  • 1970s:
    VIETNAM
    OMAN
    LAOS
    SOUTH DAKOTA
    MIDEAST
    CHILE
    CAMBODIA
    ANGOLA
  • 1980s:
    IRAN
    LIBYA
    EL SALVADOR
    NICARAGUA
    LEBANON
    HONDURAS
    GRENADA
    IRAN
    BOLIVIA
    VIRGIN ISLANDS
    PHILIPPINES
    PANAMA
  • 1990s:
    LIBERIA
    SAUDI ARABIA
    IRAQ
    KUWAIT
    LOS ANGELES
    SOMALIA
    YUGOSLAVIA
    BOSNIA
    HAITI
    CROATIA
    ZAIRE (CONGO)
    LIBERIA
    ALBANIA
    SUDAN
    AFGHANISTAN

This compilation was revised on March 23, 1999. For more information or with comments and additions please contact: Zoltan Grossman, 1705 Rutledge, Madison, WI 53704, Phone/fax: (608)246-2256. mtn@igc.apc.org

This is a partial list of U.S. military interventions from 1890 to 1999. This guide does NOT include demonstration duty by military police, mobilizations of the National Guard, offshore shows of naval strength, reinforcements of embassy personnel, the use of non-Defense Department personnel (such as the Drug Enforcement Agency), military exercises, non-combat mobilizations (such as replacing postal strikers), the permanent stationing of armed forces, covert actions where the U.S. did not play a command and control role, the use of small hostage rescue units, most uses of proxy troops, U.S. piloting of foreign warplanes, foreign disaster assistance, military training and advisory programs not involving direct combat, civic action programs, and many other military activities.

Among sources used, besides news reports, are the Congressional Record (23 June 1969), 180 landings by the U.S. Marine Corps History Division, Ege & Makhijani in Counterspy (July-Aug. 1982), and Daniel Ellsberg in Protest & Survive. 'Instances of Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1798-1993' by Ellen C. Collier of the Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.

 

Some recent history of Afghanistan

In Bush’s Sept. 14 speech, he lamented about the oppression of the Afghani people, especially the women, whom he said are forbidden to read and write. What Bush conveniently didn’t mention is the U.S. government’s direct involvement in creating those conditions of oppression. He also left out that the Afghani people would be the direct victims in the coming U.S. war.

The reactionary elements now ruling Afghanistan worked with the CIA to overthrow a progressive, socialist Afghani government that came to power in 1978. Even before the Soviet Union intervened in 1979 to defend the revolutionary Afghanis, the CIA was deeply involved in pouring billions of dollars in military weapons to destroy the fledgling government by arming reactionary elements like the Taleban and Northern Alliance (see Z. Brzezinski interview other side). After a bloody war that killed thousands of Soviets and Afghanis, the U.S.-backed reactionaries won.

Washington was unconcerned as its proteges went on to butcher Afghani progressives, restore landlordism and repress women while fighting among themselves.

The defeat of the socialist forces signified a catastrophe for the people of Afghanistan. Today, U.S. support for the Northern Alliance against the Taleban is nothing more than the continued cynical use of one reactionary force against another reactionary group now in power, in order to further destroy the country and take complete U.S. military control of Afghanistan for corporate oil interests. A look at a map shows Afghanistan as the most direct path to the oil-rich region of Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. The U.S. is now pressuring those former Soviet republics to permit permanent U.S. bases on their soil.

Following is a little-known history of how the U.S. strangled the 1978 popular revolution against feudalism and imperialism that took place in Afghanistan. The same U.S. government which spent tens of billions of dollars to destroy the Afghani revolution is not carrying out its newest war to restore women’s rights or resolve the terrible economic and social crisis of the Afghani people as a whole.

Geopolitical interests and the vast potential oil profits of the Caspian area are the driving forces behind Bush’s slaughter-bombing of one of the poorest countries in the world. It is critical for all people who support justice to oppose the U.S. bombing war of Afghanistan or any other country.

In 1978, Afghanistan was ruled by the reactionary government of Mohammad Daoud, which was close to both the shah of Iran and the United States. On April 26, 1978, this government arrested almost the entire leadership of the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA), a party of young revolutionaries formed in 1965. There had been a huge funeral procession just a week earlier for a murdered member of the PDPA. The new arrests were seen as an attempt to annihilate the Party just as the military junta had done to the workers' parties in the CIA’s 1973 coup in Chile. 

An uprising by the lower ranks of the military freed the popular leader of the PDPA, Nur Mohammad Taraki. The soldiers actually broke down his prison walls with a tank. Within a day, Daoud was overthrown and a revolutionary government proclaimed, headed by Taraki.

This uprising of the soldiers and the city masses, many of them low-paid civil servants in a country with very little industry, was every bit as glorious as earlier revolutions against feudal tyranny in Europe. It held the promise of breaking down the old traditions based on oppression and fear.

The leaders of the PDPA were educated, although some, like Taraki, came from very poor families. They had been to Kabul University, some had studied abroad, and they yearned to bring enlightenment and material progress to Afghanistan.

The U.S. CIA began building a mercenary army, recruiting feudal warlords and their servants for a "holy war" against the communists, who had liberated "their" women and "their" peasants. The U.S. spent billions of dollars every year on the war.

The only country in the area ready to help the Afghani Revolution was the Soviet Union. The USSR intervened militarily at the behest of the Afghani revolutionary government. But it could not defeat the CIA’s well-armed counter-revolutionary force. The Soviet Union finally withdrew the troops in 1989 as the shift to the right within the USSR became critical.

The U.S. war in Afghanistan began in 1979. It continued long after the last progressive government in Kabul fell in 1992. The recent stage has been an orgy of destruction as rival reactionary groups fought for control of the capital, now mostly destroyed.

More than 2 million Afghanis have been killed in this struggle, and millions more made refugees. Now half the remaining population -- the women -- have been returned to the status of property without a single human right. A poor man unable to pay his debts can have his hand cut off for theft. The schools and clinics built by the revolution are in ruins. The Taleban—the current government of Afghanistan—is a fundamentalist group supported by Pakistan that was trained and armed by the U.S. CIA.

This is the hideous face of counter-revolution. Afghanistan has been dragged back more than 100 years. But it was the most modern weapons and communications systems, made in the USA, that killed the progressive dream of a generation of Afghani social revolutionaries.

Unocal, together with Delta Oil Co. of Saudi Arabia, is working on building both a gas and an oil pipeline from Pakistan to Turkmenistan via Afghanistan. In 1996, Chris Taggart, executive vice president of the company, said these projects are "now more likely to succeed than they were two weeks ago [before the killings of remaining Afghani progressives]." These are multi-billion-dollar projects that promise huge profits to the transnational oil companies.

top

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Adviser under Carter,
from Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan. 15-21, 1998:

Brzezinski: . . . According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, Dec. 24, 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired the Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

B: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?

B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it?

top

Conditions for Women in Afghanistan's History
Conditions in Afghanistan have not always been as they are. What authority bears witness to this? None other than the U.S. Department of the Army itself.

"Afghanistan-a Country Study" for 1986 has of course the anti-communist line expected of a Pentagon publication. But it also contains useful information about the changes instituted by the 1978 Afghani Revolution.

·         Among the first decrees of the revolutionary regime were to prohibit bride-price and give women freedom of choice in marriage. "Historically," said the U.S. manual, "gender roles and women's status have been tied to property relations. Women and children tend to be assimilated into the concept of property and to belong to a male." Also: "A bride who did not exhibit signs of virginity on the wedding night could be murdered by her father and/or brothers." The revolution was challenging all this.

·         Young women in the cities, where the new government's authority was strong, could tear off the veil, freely go out in public, attend school and get a job. They were organized in the Democratic Women's Organization of Afghanistan, founded in 1965.

·         Before the 1978 revolution, 5% of Afghanistan's rural landowners owned more than 45% of the arable land. A third of the rural people were landless laborers, sharecroppers or tenants. Debts to the landlords and to money lenders "were a regular feature of rural life," says the U.S. Army report. An indebted farmer turned over half his crop each year to the money lender. "When the PDPA took power, it quickly moved to remove both landownership inequalities and usury," says the Pentagon report. Decree number six of the revolution canceled mortgage debts of agricultural laborers, tenants and small landowners.

·         The revolutionary regime set up extensive literacy programs, especially for women. It printed textbooks in many languages-Dari, Pashtu, Uzbek, Turkic and Baluchi. "The government trained many more teachers, built additional schools and kindergartens, and instituted nurseries for orphans," says the study. Before, female illiteracy had been 96.3 percent in Afghanistan. Rural illiteracy of both sexes was 90.5 percent.

·         By 1985, despite a counter-revolutionary war financed by the CIA, there had been an 80-percent increase in hospital beds. The government initiated mobile medical units and brigades of women and young people to go to the undeveloped countryside and provide medical services to the peasants for the first time.